IT OVERWHELMS ME THAT ON ONE HAND WOMEN ARE POWERFUL, INDEPENDENT AND AS GOOD AS MEN. ON THE OTHER HAND THEY ARE TO WEAK TO READ THE WORD, "VIOLATE" SINCE IT MIGHT CAUSE DISTRESS.
DISTRESS, discomfort, stress, hurt feelings, DISRESPECT, AND ON AND ON ARE EMOTIONS TOO POWERFUL FOR WOMEN TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE AND SO EVERY WORD THAT MIGHT "TRIGGER" SUCH A OPPRESSIVE EMOTION NEEDS TO BE BANNED FROM THE VOCABULARY OF EVERY AMERICAN.
Notable & Quotable
Harvard Law Prof. Jeannie Suk on students too sensitive to discuss the law of sexual violence.
Harvard Law Prof. Jeannie Suk writing at newyorker.com, Dec. 15:
Students seem more anxious about classroom discussion, and about approaching the law of sexual violence in particular, than they have ever been in my eight years as a law professor. Student organizations representing women’s interests now routinely advise students that they should not feel pressured to attend or participate in class sessions that focus on the law of sexual violence, and which might therefore be traumatic. These organizations also ask criminal-law teachers to warn their classes that the rape-law unit might “trigger” traumatic memories. Individual students often ask teachers not to include the law of rape on exams for fear that the material would cause them to perform less well. One teacher I know was recently asked by a student not to use the word “violate” in class—as in “Does this conduct violate the law?”—because the word was triggering. Some students have even suggested that rape law should not be taught because of its potential to cause distress.
* * * * * *
To add to this ALL LAW STUDENTS are too shaken up by the events of Ferguson and Staton Island, where law breakers died at the hands of sworn policemen, to be able to take their end of term or mid-term examinations. Too shaken up. So some law schools delay such examinations for fear of...
No comments:
Post a Comment